Oil and gas activity can have a wide range of impacts on natural ecosystems, from the initial exploration stage, through development, production and decommissioning of infrastructure.

Oil and gas wells, pumping stations, roads, pipelines and collecting systems all have a substantial footprint, and so a clear and open lifetime planning system is vital to ensure avoidance of sensitive ecosystems.

    • Introduction
    • Impacts
    • History
    • Archive
    • Other Areas
    Castle, Prairie Bluff well, N.Douglas

    Prairie Bluff, Castle (N. Douglas)

    Moose Mountain well, N.Douglas

    Moose Mountain well, Kananaskis (N. Douglas)

    According to Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, oil and gas well reclamation is progressing at a much slower rate than well abandonment. This is resulting in a buildup of uncertified wells. On average, between 2002 and 2011, 14,227 wells were drilled per year, 4,111 were abandoned and 1,682 certified. This indicates that over the last 10 years, the certification rate has been approximately 40.9 per cent of the abandonment rate (Oil and Gas Reclamation, Alberta ESRD, March 2012)

    Position

    Alberta Wilderness Association believes that hydrocarbon exploration and development should be regulated in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of wilderness values. There is a fundamental need for the maintenance of wilderness that is free of industrial incursion. Outside of such areas, exploration and development must be conducted in an environmentally responsible manner.

    Natural gas withdraws and consumes large amounts of water during extraction and energy production. The life cycle consumption and withdrawal based on input, plant, and cooling type is reported in the following table.

    Input Plant Type Cooling Type Consumption coefficient (L/kWh or m3/MWh) Withdrawals coefficient (L/kWh or m3/MWh) Percent consumption to withdrawal Consumption for 1000 MW Plant (L/Year) Withdrawals for 1000 MW Plant (L/Year) Consumption Compared to # of Albertans Avg. Annual Use
    Conventional gas/CBM Cogeneration Cooling Pond 0.31 0.67 46% 2,170,000,000 4,690,000,000 30,488
    Shale Gas Cogeneration Cooling Pond 0.38 0.74 51% 2,660,000,000 5,180,000,000 37,373
    Conventional gas/CBM Cogeneration Cooling Tower 0.32 0.62 52% 2,240,000,000 4,340,000,000 31,472
    Shale Gas Cogeneration Cooling Tower 0.39 0.69 57% 2,730,000,000 4,830,000,000 38,356
    Conventional gas/CBM Cogeneration Dry Cooling 0.07 0.1 70% 490,000,000 700,000,000 6,884
    Shale Gas Cogeneration Dry Cooling 0.14 0.17 82% 980,000,000 1,190,000,000 13,769
    Conventional gas/CBM Cogeneration Once Through 0.23 14.66 2% 1,610,000,000 102,620,000,000 22,620
    Shale Gas Cogeneration Once Through 0.3 14.73 2% 2,100,000,000 103,110,000,000 29,505
    Conventional gas/CBM NG Combined Cycle Cooling Pond 0.72 1.15 63% 5,012,000,000 8,022,000,000 70,418
    Shale Gas NG Combined Cycle Cooling Pond 0.8 1.23 65% 5,596,000,000 8,606,000,000 78,623
    Conventional gas/CBM NG Combined Cycle Cooling Tower 0.69 1.02 68% 4,802,000,000 7,112,000,000 67,468
    Shale Gas NG Combined Cycle Cooling Tower 0.77 1.1 70% 5,386,000,000 7,696,000,000 75,673
    Conventional gas/CBM NG Combined Cycle Dry Cooling 0.12 0.15 80% 833,000,000 1,064,000,000 11,704
    Shale Gas NG Combined Cycle Dry Cooling 0.2 0.24 83% 1,417,000,000 1,648,000,000 19,909
    Conventional gas/CBM NG Combined Cycle Once Through 0.42 40.85 1% 2,912,000,000 285,922,000,000 40,913
    Shale Gas NG Combined Cycle Once Through 0.5 40.93 1% 3,496,000,000 286,506,000,000 49,118
    Conventional gas/CBM Single/simple Cycle 0.17 0.46 37% 1,218,000,000 3,248,000,000 17,113
    Shale Gas Single/simple Cycle 0.3 0.59 51% 2,093,000,000 4,123,000,000 29,406
    Conventional gas/CBM Steam Cycle Cooling Pond 1.86 2.33 80% 13,033,000,000 16,323,000,000 183,112
    Shale Gas Steam Cycle Cooling Pond 2.01 2.48 81% 14,094,000,000 17,384,000,000 198,019
    Conventional gas/CBM Steam Cycle Cooling Tower 2.42 2.98 81% 16,953,000,000 20,873,000,000 238,188
    Shale Gas Steam Cycle Cooling Tower 2.57 3.13 82% 18,014,000,000 21,934,000,000 253,094
    Conventional gas/CBM Steam Cycle Dry Cooling 0.33 0.39 85% 2,337,000,000 2,729,000,000 32,835
    Shale Gas Steam Cycle Dry Cooling 0.49 0.54 91% 3,398,000,000 3,790,000,000 47,741
    Conventional gas/CBM Steam Cycle Once Through 1.27 138.39 1% 8,903,000,000 968,743,000,000 125,086
    Shale Gas Steam Cycle Once Through 1.42 138.54 1% 9,964,000,000 969,804,000,000 139,993
    Note: Annual withdrawal and consumption for a 1000 MW plant are calculated with a capacity factor of 80 %, which assumes the plant runs for 7000 hrs in a year. Average Albertan consumption is assumed to be 71,175 L per year, based on Stats Canada’s Average daily litres of water used per capita in residential sector
    Table Source: Ali, B. & Kumar, A. 2015 Development of life cycle water footprints for gas-fired power generation technologies. Energy Conversion and Management, 110, 386 – 396

     

    2020

    In February, AWA learned that Alberta-based Seven Generations Energy was the first Canadian natural gas producer to receive Equitable Origins’ (EO) certification to the EO100 standard. AWA has since engaged with Equitable Origins certifiers to support a sound application of the biodiversity provisions of their oil and gas certification, which we believe could help improve energy industry land-use practices. Since June, AWA has engaged directly with Seven Generations Energy around biodiversity concerns and opportunities in its Kakwa region lease holdings.

    In early April, AWA voiced concerns about Alberta’s March 31 decision to suspend most energy industry environmental compliance reporting requirements. We were unconvinced that this was a pandemic safety-related measure since all data gathering and record-keeping requirements remained. We joined First Nations and other ENGOs in raising concerns when Alberta further suspended most environmental monitoring requirements in late April and early May; this occurred at a time when other economic activities were re-opening with pandemic safety measures in place. Although reporting and monitoring resumed in July 2020, AWA remains concerned about the interruption of compliance reporting and loss of data collection without transparent justification.

    January 22, 2008

    AWA News Release: Government Violates Guidelines and Allows Further Destruction of Endangered Caribou Habitat

    It has been recently learned that government continues to permit industrial use in these intact…

    Read more »

    April 3, 2007

    ENGO Letter to Premier Stelmach

    A letter to Premier Stelmach from various ENGOs with concerns in the Southern Foothills calling…

    Read more »

    August 1, 2006

    EUB Out of Sync with Public Demands to Protect Natural Environment

    Wild Lands Advocate 14(4): 19 – 21, August 2006 200608_AR_LP.pdf

    Read more »

    June 26, 2006

    Letter from Landowner Groups and AWA

    Open letter to the Energy and Utilities Board and the Government of Alberta, sent by…

    Read more »

    April 10, 2006

    AWA News Release: Drilling Slated for Kakwa’s Pristine Woodland Caribou Range

    An application to construct a wellsite and access road in middle of the Narraway woodland…

    Read more »

    January 24, 2006

    AWA News Release: Government breaks policy to allow industrial use of Little Smoky caribou range

    “The new sale of oil and gas land leases in the heart of habitat for…

    Read more »

    January 17, 2006

    AWA News Release: Wildlife Killed To Make Way For Energy Extraction — Wolves and Caribou Suffer in Alberta’s Little Smoky

    The Government of Alberta and the energy industry’s stated commitment to wildlife conservation and rescuing…

    Read more »

    December 1, 2005

    Drawing a Line in the Foothills against CBM Development

    Wild Lands Advocate article, December 2005, By Barbara Janusz 200512_AR_LP1.pdf

    Read more »

    September 21, 2004

    EnCana’s “Ruthless Plans” for Prairies Raise Protests from Residents

    Letter by Jonathan Wright to Alberta Energy Utilities Board, published in the Wild Lands Advocate,…

    Read more »

    December 16, 2003

    EUB Whaleback Decision

    EUB’s decision to deny permission to Polaris Resources to drill a sour gas well in…

    Read more »

    October 1, 2003

    Finding The Public Interest At The Whaleback Hearing

    Wild Lands Advocate article, October 2003, By Dr. Shirley Bray 200310_AR_WH.pdf

    Read more »